Featured alternatives · 2026

The 7 best Featured.com alternatives for 2026

Last updated June 2026 · independently researched

Featured.com (formerly Terkel) does one thing well: a curated, low-spam source-request platform where you answer journalist questions — many from Fortune- and Fast Company-tier outlets — and earn quotes, citations, and backlinks. It also now runs the revived HARO. But the complaints are consistent: it works in practice as a pay-to-play SEO link-building tool, where the free plan caps you at ~3 answers a month and the real value sits behind the $7/credit, ~$50/mo Pro, and ~$100/mo Business tiers. You never reach the publisher directly, and its domain-authority filters quietly exclude smaller and niche outlets.

So the real choice is between two jobs: screening and answering journalist questions vs. proactively finding and pitching the right journalists yourself. Medialyst combines proactive outreach with a read-only MCP feed for six approved request sources; it does not submit responses into Featured or any other network. Below, both jobs, compared fairly.

FreeMonitor journalist requests from HARO, Connectively, LinkedIn & more with an AI agent
Top picks at a glance

Connect one authenticated MCP feed to Claude, ChatGPT, or another compatible agent. It checks six included request channels every hour, uses zero Medialyst credits, and keeps every response behind human review.

  • $0
  • 0 credits
  • Checks every hour
  • Human review before anything sends
Start free monitoring

All six sources included free

  • Connectively logo
  • HARO logo
  • Twitter/X logo
  • LinkedIn logo
  • MentionMatch logo
  • Substack logo
How we ranked these

Ranked on what actually decides a workflow.

Our methodology

A disclosure up front: we make Medialyst, so we've ranked it first — but be clear-eyed about what that means. Medialyst is a proactive journalist-discovery and outreach tool with a read-only MCP feed that helps agents screen six approved request sources. It is not a response marketplace: it cannot submit an answer into Featured, and a human still chooses how to respond. If that in-network response workflow is the job, the source-request tools below are the closer fit. We evaluated every tool on query quality, outlet tier, usable free access, price transparency, spam, and whether you interact with the publisher directly. Pricing is drawn from public pages and customer reviews as of June 2026; Featured's real strengths are acknowledged throughout.

ToolBest forStandoutStarting priceFree option
1MedialystPR teams, founders, and experts who want proactive outreach plus agent-readable monitoring of approved request sources in one workflow.AI reads each journalist's recent coverage and scores fit for your storyFrom $97/mo (annual) · $149/mo monthlyFree first list · no credit card
2QwotedExperts and PR teams who want the closest like-for-like to Featured's curated model — inbound queries from elite, verified outlets with the least spam.Largest share of DR 80+ outlets among source-request platforms, aggressively anti-spam$99/mo (annual) or $149/mo monthly, ProFree tier (2 pitches/mo, 2-hr delay)
3HAROAnyone who wants a free, zero-commitment inbound query feed and is willing to scan three emails a day to find a fit.Free, ad-supported, 1M+ sources — the most recognizable query brand, now with AI-spam detectionFree (ad-supported)Free (email newsletter)
4JustReachOutSMBs and DIY founders who want inbound query discovery and the ability to proactively pitch from one tool, with built-in PR education.Aggregates journalist requests from 20+ sources and pairs them with a 700K-journalist database and AI pitching$147 / $247 / $497 per month7-day trial (card required)
5Source of Sources (SOS)Experts and small teams who want a free, no-frills journalist-query feed and trust the original HARO pedigree.Built by Peter Shankman, who created HARO — free, email-first, deliberately simpleFreeFree (email feed)
6MentionMatchB2B founders, SaaS marketers, and subject-matter experts who only want queries from business and trade publications.Free and tightly niched to B2B/SaaS queries — far less consumer noiseFreeFree
7ConnectivelyMostly historical — anyone researching what happened to the old HARO/Connectively. The live product is now Featured's paid tier.Cision's HARO rebrand that shut down Dec 9, 2024 — now Featured.com's relaunched paid platformPaid; tiers unverified during relaunchNo standalone free tier (HARO is the free option)

Pricing reflects public pages and customer reviews as of June 2026. Featured itself runs a free tier (~3 answers/mo), $7/credit, a Pro plan around $50/mo, and Business around $100/mo, and now operates the free HARO newsletter. Connectively's relaunch tiers are unsettled — verify at connectively.us. Source of Sources and MentionMatch are free.

The ranked list

The 7 best Featured alternatives.

1
MedialystOur pick5.0/5 on G2
AI-native journalist discovery — story-in, verified list out
Medialyst interface

Medialyst is the AI-native media list builder. Instead of handing you a giant static database to filter and verify yourself, it reads hundreds of articles relevant to your specific announcement, surfaces the journalists who actually cover it, scores them 0–100 by fit with reasoning grounded in their recent work, and verifies every email in real time before it reaches you. It runs from a chat box — paste a release, a URL, or a one-line description — and from inside Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor via a public REST API and a hosted remote MCP server. Pricing is public, monthly, and contract-free; your first list is free with no credit card.

Pros

Cons

  • Read-only request monitoring — it does not submit responses into Featured or another source network
  • Newer than the legacy incumbents — not the choice if a recognizable enterprise brand name is itself the requirement
Find my journalists — freeSee pricing →
2
Qwoted4.5/5 on G2
The high-quality, vetted source-request marketplace
Qwoted interface

If you like Featured's curated, low-spam model but want it as a live marketplace, Qwoted is the closest swap. It processes roughly 200 journalist queries a day and, per a BuzzStream study, holds the highest share of DR 80+ high-authority publication requests among source-request platforms — Forbes, CNBC, Yahoo Finance reporters actively asking for sources. It bans AI-pitch spam aggressively, which keeps signal quality high. The honest catches mirror Featured's: the free tier is nearly unusable (2 pitches a month with a 2-hour delay that lets paying users answer first), Pro is a real price step at $99/mo billed annually, and it's inbound-only — you're still responding to queries, not pitching your own story. There's also a recurring Trustpilot pattern of accounts suspended without much explanation, recently including AI-content bans, so be careful if you draft with AI.

Pros

  • Highest share of high-authority (DR 80+) outlets among source-request tools
  • Aggressive anti-spam filtering keeps query quality high — like Featured
  • Surfaces podcasts, speaking, and awards beyond article quotes, plus real networking

Cons

  • Free tier is heavily limited (2 pitches/mo with a 2-hour delay)
  • Inbound-only — you respond to queries, you don't pitch your own story
  • Reports of account suspensions, recently including AI-content bans
Medialyst vs QwotedVisit Qwoted
3
HARO
The free query newsletter — now run by Featured itself
HARO interface

Here's the twist that matters for this list: Featured.com actually operates HARO. It bought the brand back from Cision in April 2025 and revived it as a free, ad-supported email newsletter of journalist requests, sent three times a day to a million-plus sources. So if Featured's free tier feels too capped, HARO is the same company's free front door — same curation philosophy, no answer limits, no payment. In July 2025 it added Pangram AI-detection so journalists can filter out AI-generated pitches, which has helped the spam problem that nearly killed it. The trade-off is everything a broadcast newsletter implies: you're one of hundreds answering the same query, there's no contact data or verification, and it's purely reactive — you can only respond to what journalists happen to ask today. Featured's paid Connectively platform is the upsell from here; HARO is the free version of the same motion.

Pros

  • Genuinely free with no answer caps — the simplest way to keep doing 'Featured-style' inbound
  • 1M+ sources and 15-year brand recognition means a steady supply of queries
  • Pangram AI-spam detection (added 2025) has improved query quality

Cons

  • Broadcast crowd model — hundreds answer the same query, low acceptance odds
  • No contact data, no verification, no direct publisher relationship
  • Reactive only — you answer what's asked, you can't proactively pitch
Medialyst vs HAROVisit HARO
4
JustReachOut4.6/5 on G2
Source requests plus a database and pitching, in one app
JustReachOut interface

JustReachOut is the most full-featured swap if you want more than a query feed. Post-HARO it built a curated press-opportunity finder that aggregates journalist requests from 20+ sources and updates throughout the day — and it pairs that inbound discovery with a 700,000-journalist database, AI-drafted pitches, and sending from your own Gmail or Outlook, so you can both answer queries and proactively pitch from one place. It's also unusually good at teaching, with a PR Academy aimed at solopreneurs. The honest limits: it's pricier than the pure feeds ($147–$497/mo, contract-free with a 7-day card-required trial), the database search is recency-biased and skews US-heavy, the UX feels dated to some reviewers, and it's candid that real results take three to six months. For a Featured user who wants to expand beyond answering prompts without jumping to a full database tool, it's a sensible middle path.

Pros

  • Combines source-request discovery with a database and proactive pitching
  • Strong PR education (PR Academy) for DIY founders and small teams
  • Contract-free monthly pricing, sends from your own inbox

Cons

  • More expensive than the pure query feeds ($147–$497/mo)
  • Recency-biased, US-skewed database search and a dated UX
  • Honest that meaningful results take three to six months
Medialyst vs JustReachOutVisit JustReachOut
5
Source of Sources (SOS)
The free HARO successor from HARO's own founder
Source of Sources (SOS) interface

Source of Sources is the closest thing to 'classic HARO,' built by Peter Shankman — the person who invented HARO in 2008 before selling it to Vocus/Cision. After HARO's various shutdowns and relaunches, SOS reopened the original playbook: a free email feed of journalist source requests you can answer to earn quotes and citations. It's deliberately stripped-down — no dashboard, no AI co-pilot, no subscription — which is exactly the appeal for people burned by the platformization (and pricing) of the Featured/Connectively era. The trade-off is the same one every broadcast query feed has: you're answering in a public crowd, spam and low acceptance rates are real, and there's no contact data, no verification, and no proactive discovery. As a free, credible inbound feed to run alongside HARO, it's a sensible pick; as a replacement for Featured's curated, vetted publisher network, it's lighter-weight and noisier.

Pros

  • Genuinely free, with the credibility of HARO's original founder
  • Simple email-first model with no platform to learn or subscription to manage
  • A reasonable free complement to HARO and Qwoted for inbound coverage

Cons

  • Broadcast crowd model — you compete with everyone who got the same query
  • No vetting, no contact data, no verification, and historically prone to spam
  • Reactive only: no way to proactively find or pitch specific journalists
Visit Source of Sources (SOS)
6
MentionMatch
The free, B2B-only source-request feed
MentionMatch interface

MentionMatch (formerly Help a B2B Writer, from the team behind the Superpath content-marketing community) is a free source-request service with one sharp differentiator: it only carries B2B queries. Where HARO and Featured cast across consumer, lifestyle, finance, and B2B all at once, MentionMatch filters to business, SaaS, and trade-publication requests, so a B2B expert wastes less time scrolling past irrelevant consumer prompts. Requests arrive by email and you respond directly to the writer. It's free and well-regarded for relevance within its lane. The limits are scope and scale: query volume is much lower than HARO/Featured because it's niche by design, it's useless if you need consumer or general-interest coverage, and like every query feed it's reactive, broadcast, and offers no journalist contact data or verification. For a B2B audience specifically, the higher signal-to-noise can beat Featured's broader queue.

Pros

  • Free, with a B2B-only focus that strips out consumer-query noise
  • Higher relevance-per-query for SaaS, fintech, and trade-press experts
  • Simple email workflow with direct replies to the writer

Cons

  • Niche by design — much lower query volume than HARO or Featured
  • No use at all for consumer or general-interest coverage
  • Reactive broadcast feed with no contact data, verification, or discovery
Visit MentionMatch
7
Connectively
Discontinued, then revived as Featured's own paid platform
Connectively interface

Connectively is mostly here to clear up confusion, because it's a moving target. It was the name Cision gave HARO when it rebranded in March 2024 — then Cision discontinued it entirely on December 9, 2024. The brand didn't stay dead: Featured.com revived Connectively on June 2, 2026 as its own separate paid platform, a live journalist-request feed with an AI co-pilot. So 'Connectively' as a standalone alternative to Featured no longer makes sense — it IS Featured now, sitting one tier above the free HARO newsletter. If you're evaluating it, you're really evaluating Featured's paid product under a different name, and its pricing is unsettled during the relaunch (sources cite both $49 and $149/mo). For most people the practical choice is HARO (free) or one of the vetted feeds above.

Pros

  • Live request feed with an AI co-pilot, backed by Featured/HARO's network
  • Useful if you specifically want Featured's paid platform under its Connectively brand
  • Spans journalists, podcasts, speaking, and awards in one feed

Cons

  • Discontinued by Cision on Dec 9, 2024 — the original is dead
  • Now just Featured's own paid tier, not an independent alternative
  • Pricing unsettled during the relaunch (cited at both $49 and $149/mo)
Medialyst vs ConnectivelyVisit Connectively
Try it free · no account to start

Paste a story. Get your journalist list in minutes.

Drop in a press release, your website URL, or a one-line description of your news. Medialyst reads what's relevant, finds reporters who actually cover it, scores them by fit, and verifies every email — your first list is free, no credit card.

First list free · No credit card
FAQ

Featured alternatives — common questions.

What is the best Featured.com alternative in 2026?
It depends on the job. If you need to submit responses inside a curated network, Qwoted is the closest like-for-like and HARO is the best free newsletter. Medialyst is the best fit when you want an agent to screen approved requests across Connectively, HARO, Twitter/X, LinkedIn, MentionMatch, and Substack — all six platforms free — then also find and verify journalists for proactive outreach. Its MCP feed is read-only, so a human still handles the response.
Why do people look for a Featured alternative?
The most common reasons: Featured functions in practice as a pay-to-play SEO link-building tool, where results scale with spend; the free plan caps you at roughly three answers a month; you never interact with the publisher directly (you submit into a queue and hope to be selected); and its domain-authority filters exclude smaller and niche outlets. None of that means Featured is bad — it's genuinely curated, low-spam, and tied to Fortune- and Fast Company-tier publishers — but those frictions push people to either a different query feed or a proactive outreach tool.
Is Featured the same as HARO now?
They're related but not identical. Featured.com bought HARO back from Cision in April 2025 and revived it as a free, ad-supported email newsletter of journalist requests, sent three times a day. Featured's own platform (and its paid Connectively tier) is a separate, curated product with free and paid plans. So Featured operates HARO, but HARO is the free newsletter while Featured/Connectively is the curated platform. If Featured's free caps frustrate you, HARO — from the same company — is the no-cost version of the same inbound motion.
Are there free alternatives to Featured?
Yes. HARO is free again as an email newsletter, Source of Sources is a free query feed, and MentionMatch is free for B2B/SaaS queries. Medialyst also makes request polling free through its authenticated MCP feed: Connectively, HARO, Twitter/X, LinkedIn, MentionMatch, and Substack all cost zero credits. Proactive media-list research has separate plan and credit rules.
What's the real difference between answering source requests and proactive outreach?
Source requests are reactive: a journalist posts a question and you answer alongside everyone else. Proactive outreach starts with your story and finds the journalists who cover it. Medialyst supports both screening and research: its MCP feed normalizes six approved request sources for human-reviewed triage, while its research workflow finds, scores, and verifies journalists. The MCP feed does not submit responses.
What happened to Connectively?
Connectively was the name Cision gave HARO when it rebranded in March 2024. Cision then shut it down entirely on December 9, 2024. The brand was revived on June 2, 2026 by Featured.com as its own separate paid platform — a live journalist-request feed with an AI co-pilot, sitting one tier above the free HARO newsletter. So the original Connectively is gone; the name now belongs to Featured's paid product, with relaunch pricing still unsettled (cited at both $49 and $149/mo).
Can I use Featured and Medialyst together?
Yes. Medialyst can surface authorized Connectively requests in the same read-only MCP feed as HARO, Twitter/X, LinkedIn, MentionMatch, and Substack — all six platforms free; use Featured itself when you decide to answer. Medialyst also handles proactive research when you have a story to push. If you keep a media list elsewhere, upload its CSV to re-verify and re-score the contacts.
Keep comparing

Other alternatives guides.

Tired of answering prompts and waiting to be picked? Pitch the right journalists yourself.

Start free with 100 credits and no credit card. Paste your story and get a verified, story-specific list of journalists in minutes.

Find my journalists
Or monitor journalist requests with an AI agent for free